Search for: "BAKER v. THE STATE" Results 2541 - 2560 of 2,917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 7:01 pm
 But I find Judge Hudson's analysis here defensible nonetheless because the older cases have not been formally overruled, and as I have noted recently in discussing the Prop 8 litigation and Baker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 12:15 pm by Mark Walsh
Baker, about federal appeals court review of an order denying class certification. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 7:07 am
Menell and David Nimmer in a separate submission also highlight inconsistency with SCOTUS’s seminal decision in Baker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 7:11 am by fjhinojosa
Soonpaa’s article Using Composition Theory and Scholarship to Teach Legal Writing More Effectively is cited in the following article: Carolyn V. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Baker, No. 06-40757 Conviction for possessing, receiving, and distributing child pornography is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the sentence vacated and remanded, where: 1) a pretrial motion to suppress evidence was properly denied; but 2) two government exhibits that were the basis for the distribution conviction were improperly admitted as lacking respectively a proper foundation and proper authentication. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Peck
Life Investors, Inc. (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 313, 317 [223 Cal.Rptr. 539], superseded by statute as stated in Cooper v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
But "Ohio State" has echoes of one of the key cases cited in support of the mandate: the 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
  This was a reference to the Supreme Court decision in 1972 in the case of Baker v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:46 am
In the leading Indian decision on the point, Linklaters v ITO, this solution has been rejected. [read post]