Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 2541 - 2560 of 14,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2010, 3:00 pm
v=_RHha6fYzhY http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:43 am by Peter J. Sluka
Brown and Chiari in response denied that Capizzi was an equity partner with the power to dissolve BCLLP. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:02 am
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:17 pm
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:25 am by Scott J. Davis, Mayer Brown LLP,
Editor’s Note: Scott Davis is the head of the US Mergers and Acquisitions group at Mayer Brown LLP. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:56 pm by Tom Smith
Now they will no longer be able to have their cake and eat it too.Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:17 am by Eugene Volokh
I have no firm opinion on the standing question, but the concurrence’s substantive analysis seems correct to me, especially given Marsh v. [read post]