Search for: "Banks v. People" Results 2541 - 2560 of 4,977
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm by Cindy Cohn and rainey Reitman
As our world becomes more networked, technology has the capacity to connect people worldwide to unlimited information and other people. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Protecting content v. potential impediments to future innovations. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The US had a very hard time writing regulations to govern the banks’ duty to refuse to process Internet gaming transactions. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:58 am by INFORRM
I mean all banking information – banks already have obligations of confidence, they have contractual remedies, they are subject to the Privacy Act and now the Privacy Commissioner has the power to give penalties. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 8:34 pm by Cindy Cohn
It avoids the Kafkaesque situations in which people, like Joseph K in The Trial and the thousands of people on the secret No Fly Lists, cannot figure out what they did that resulted in government scrutiny, much less clear their names. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
 Annabelle now writes to let us know that she has put online the various videos of each presentation, for those people who could not attend the seminar. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
The International Monetary Fund (part of the World Bank) defines money generally as a “store of value,” which means people can save it and use it later—smoothing their purchases over time; other definitions refer to money as a: Unit of account, that is, provide a common base for prices; or Medium of exchange, something that people can use to buy and sell from one another. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:42 am
Kelvyn Banks is a very, very bad guy.Whose death sentence is unanimously affirmed by the California Supreme Court.Scary dude. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am by Jane Chong
Here’s the introduction: In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Riley v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:08 am
National Bank Assn.) and for the worst majority opinion (People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
I also pointed out that all sorts of questions remained to be answered.Last week, in Shankar v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]