Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 15,034
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2021, 11:13 am
That all changed in 1961 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Monroe v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am
In Bishop v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 2:54 pm
In its recent non-precedential opinion in Olaplex, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:38 am
“The party seeking the protection of collateral estoppel bears the burden of proving that the identical issue was necessarily decided in the prior proceeding and is decisive of the present action,” and conversely, “the party against whom preclusion is sought bears the burden of demonstrating the absence of a full and fair opportunity to contest the prior determination” (id. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:03 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
15 May 2021, 5:02 am
" … "For discovery purposes, courts define relevance broadly, stating that information is relevant if it bears on or might reasonably lead to information that bears on any material fact or issue in the action …. [read post]
14 May 2021, 12:30 pm
In 1994 (pre-Lawrence v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:45 am
Citing a number of earlier court rulings including Matter of Martin v New York State Comptroller, 161 AD3d 1418, the Appellate Division affirmed the Comptroller's decision, explaining that to qualify for a RSSL §607-c performance of duty disability retirement the applicant bears the burden of establishing that his alleged incapacity was "the natural and proximate result of any act of any inmate or any person confined in an institution under [county]… [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:45 am
Citing a number of earlier court rulings including Matter of Martin v New York State Comptroller, 161 AD3d 1418, the Appellate Division affirmed the Comptroller's decision, explaining that to qualify for a RSSL §607-c performance of duty disability retirement the applicant bears the burden of establishing that his alleged incapacity was "the natural and proximate result of any act of any inmate or any person confined in an institution under [county]… [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am
The Federal Government must bring to bear the full scope of its authorities and resources to protect and secure its computer systems, whether they are cloud-based, on-premises, or hybrid. [read post]
13 May 2021, 6:48 am
” Nissim v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm
Now please bear with me, as I have to be a bit abbreviated this week because of the press of business. [read post]
9 May 2021, 2:02 pm
Supreme Court case, Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 1:58 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:05 pm
Kamakana v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 2:09 pm
In 1974, in Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:11 pm
It stated that Facebook must review the matter and come up with a more proportionate response within six months. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:25 am
In Ford v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:23 pm
And no one could doubt that America was initially built on a de facto reality of significantly open borders, at least if one were not a "vicious pauper," in the language of Mayor of New York v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 10:11 am
The idea behind the popular trope, “You can’t yell fire in a crowded theater” comes from Schenck v. [read post]
