Search for: "Bui v. State" Results 2541 - 2560 of 9,822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
 Some states have strayed from this long-held view that a pet dog negligently killed is worth only what it costs to buy that particular type of dog. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:38 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In other words, if you buy something that wasn’t taxed and you live in a state which does impose a sales tax, you owe the tax anyway. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:18 am by Daniel Hemel
That — more or less — is the central question in Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:18 am by Eric Goldman
We work through the case study of how LinkedIn determined its vulnerabilities, set a patent development and patent buying program, and fundamentally changed its risk profile. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:49 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
 The reasoning in cases such as Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sport Leisure Pty Ltd (2012) 202 FCR 286 and Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 72 no longer apply and organisations will potentially need to reconsider their ownership arrangements in Australia. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:49 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
 The reasoning in cases such as Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sport Leisure Pty Ltd (2012) 202 FCR 286 and Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 72 no longer apply and organisations will potentially need to reconsider their ownership arrangements in Australia. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:08 am
.■ Second up, FoIB Jeff M (no relation) seems to have problems with the idea that health insurance rates have decreased buy some 3000%:"States scramble to avert Obamacare sticker shock after Democrats balk at stabilization effort"And by stabilization, of course, they mean "throwing more money at it. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
Judge Fahey’s opinion, drawing upon the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s 2004 ruling in Anastos v Sable, agreed with the m [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:03 am by Mack Sperling
  Commonly referred to as a "Shareholder Rights Plan," this type of defense usually gives shareholders the right to buy more shares at a discount if the shareholder attempting the takeover buys a certain percentage or more of the company's shares. [read post]