Search for: "California v. Texas" Results 2541 - 2560 of 4,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
Mary's, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa Clara, Seattle, Seton Hall, SMU, South Texas, Southern University, Southwestern, Stetson, Suffolk, Temple, Texas Wesleyan, Cooley, Thomas Jefferson, Toledo, Touro, Tulsa, Valparaiso, Wayne State, Western New England, Western State, Whittier, Widener, William Mitchell Before we do a rough assessment of the likely impact of the change in the US New formula on these schools, we offer a number of general observations. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:19 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The centrality of standing to this litigation is particularly interesting because (as happened in the California v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” Subscript offers a graphic explainer on Texas v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am by John Elwood
California, 220153Issue: Whether California’s sanctions against Texas and Texans – prohibiting state-funded or state-sponsored travel to Texas because Texas protects the religious freedom of faith-based child welfare providers within its borders – are born of religious animus and violate the Constitution’s privileges and immunities clause, interstate commerce clause and guarantee of equal protection. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
University of Texas at Austin, 14-981 (the affirmative action case), and Currier v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
See International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am by Christine Corcos
California before the Supreme Court in 1951, three years before Gus Garcia and Carlos Cadena made their historic argument in Hernandez v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Say a University of California professor's research uncovers that California government policy is bad for business, compared, to, say, the policy of Texas. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 1:56 pm by Kalvis Golde
” That June, the court struck down the Texas law 5-4 in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
(EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report Blog) District Court E D Texas: Ashcroft and Twombly do not require that complaint allege ‘how’ accused products infringe: WIAV Networks, LLC v 3Com Corp et al (Docket Report Blog) District Court N D California: 3-D computer graphics claims invalid under Bilski, Prometheus: FuzzySharp Technologies v 3DLabs Inc. [read post]