Search for: "Case Under Seal"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 6,727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2017, 8:48 pm
Berryhill (10th Cir., June 13, 2017) (affirming denial of Lopez's fee application under the Equal Access to Justice Act following his successful appeal; the decision appealed from, however, was substantially justified despite its being wrong)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 8:12 pm
However, the passage of House Bill 3016 means Texans will finally be able to nondisclosure a first-time DWI under certain circumstances, despite never being granted deferred adjudication. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
See, “Attacks on Police in Texas are Hate Crimes under 2017 Police Protection Act. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
If anything surprised me here, it was that the Court unanimously affirmed the Federal Circuit in an IP case. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am
” Justice Kennedy’s concurrence explicitly noted that the “case does not present the question of how other provisions of the Lanham Act should be analyzed under the First Amendment. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:38 am
In a case that could have far-reaching implications, the U.S Supreme Court has ruled that an Asian-American rock band is entitled to a federal trademark registration of its name. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:38 am
In a case that could have far-reaching implications, the U.S Supreme Court has ruled that an Asian-American rock band is entitled to a federal trademark registration of its name. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:54 am
Justice Samuel AlitoFurther to the PTO's refusal to register the sign as a trade mark, Tam took the case to federal court, where the en banc Federal Circuit ultimately found the disparagement clause in the Lanham Act facially unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:55 am
" [FOX News Insider] * Legal documents related to the dissolution of annoying jingle firm Cellino & Barnes are currently under seal, but several media outlets are trying to convince a judge to unseal the records because the "litigation over the dissolution of [the firm] is an issue of local and national importance. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 2:25 am
If every Burglary and Robbery is a felony and every Assault involves some magnitude of physical injury as a result of violence, how can these crimes not fall under the violent crime umbrella of NY CPL 70.02? [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 2:25 am
If every Burglary and Robbery is a felony and every Assault involves some magnitude of physical injury as a result of violence, how can these crimes not fall under the violent crime umbrella of NY CPL 70.02? [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 5:00 am
Source: Article: “UIM Claim Not Estopped by Arbitration Award, Superior Court Rules,” By: Ben Seal of the Pennsylvania Law Weekly(May 2, 2017). [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
Qui tamlawsuits under the FCA, the Court observed, have a “unique procedural status” and often remain under seal for months after being filed. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
Qui tamlawsuits under the FCA, the Court observed, have a “unique procedural status” and often remain under seal for months after being filed. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 8:52 am
So then what about that dastardly career bureaucracy, twiddling its thumbs inside its sealed SCIFs from D.C. to Virginia? [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
And just as one wouldn't expect a heart attack or liver disease to be covered under WC stateside, the DBA doesn't cover these things either.That's why employers here offer (or provide) health insurance for employees, to cover their non-WC-related claims. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 11:27 am
Many times, general dentists try to perform root canals on multi-rooted molars with these conditions and it could be below the standard of care for dentists under like or similar circumstances for them to do so. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:23 am
The Friedman Decision In 1994, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit all but sealed the courthouse door to business dissolution cases in federal court, at least in the territorial jurisdiction of the Second Circuit, which includes New York. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:23 am
The Friedman Decision In 1994, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit all but sealed the courthouse door to business dissolution cases in federal court, at least in the territorial jurisdiction of the Second Circuit, which includes New York. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 11:29 am
He could then, entirely consistent with the law, say under oath that he had not directed the release of this information. [read post]
