Search for: "DOES 2-25"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 16,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 2:25 pm
Cir. 1998), “express a clear view that [FDC Act § 505(j)(2)(A)] does not limit the agency’s freedom to determine what kinds of information will be needed to fulfill the listed ANDA requirements. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 2:20 pm
E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2 (2003) (discussed HERE). [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:59 am
If a car traveling fast behind us, does not see brake lights when we downshift to slow down, they do not know we are slowing down, and they rear end us. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 9:30 am
Maternal findings The study found that women who experienced migraines during pregnancy were (2): 15-25% more likely to have a cesarean delivery than those without migraines 39-61% more likely to experience pregnancy-related hypertension disorders than those without migraines 6-23% more likely to have a low birth weight baby than those without migraines 13-30% more likely to have a preterm delivery than those without migraines 5-15% more likely to experience miscarriage… [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 2:09 pm
Online videos and social media posts may trigger liability because Section 12(a)(2) does not require that a solicitation be directed or targeted to a particular investor. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 10:28 pm
LEXIS 9066, 76 U.S.L.W. 3154 (U.S.Sept. 25, 2007), is not an intervening decision under § 99-39-27(9). [read post]
13 May 2012, 7:10 am
When it comes to a termination right, we see such variables as: (1) how long does the violation need to continue before the termination right is exercisable; and (2) what is the violated tenant’s remedy before the termination right becomes exercisable? [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] The Term SOFR Concept Document is available to LSTA members through the LSTA website. [2] ARRC does not support the use of Term SOFR in consumer products or the vast majority of the derivatives market. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:39 pm
In Matter of Nelson, 25 I&N Dec. 410 (BIA 2011), the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) addressed the question of the “stop-time” rule under section 240A(d)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:34 pm
Here’s what I found: Firm 1: 12.9% (2012), 13.3% (2014) Firm 2: 15.8% (2012), 18.67% (2014) Firm 3: 25% (2012), 26.12% (2014) Firm 4: 11.52% (2012), 9.68% (2014) Now, this isn’t scientific by any means. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
The employees estimated they had to wait an average of 25 minutes per day, or nearly to 2 1/2 hours per week. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm
The court based its decision on two points: as applied here, 8 USC § 1252(e)(2) 1. does not violate the suspension clause; and 2. does not violate due process. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:22 am
Providing additional clarity on the role of an alternative trading system (ATS) in the settlement of digital asset security trades, the staff of the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets issued a no-action letter to FINRA on September 25, 2020. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 12:43 pm
Further, Section 45R does not take seasonal employees into account as employees unless they work on more than 120 days during the taxable year. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] The Term SOFR Concept Document is available to LSTA members through the LSTA website. [2] ARRC does not support the use of Term SOFR in consumer products or the vast majority of the derivatives market. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:45 am
Although Title VII does not require individualized assessment, the guidance notes that the use of such assessment can help employers avoid Title VII liability. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 9:56 am
The mother was close to her adult children, aged 28 and 25. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
This Act may be cited as the ``Families First Coronavirus Response Act''.SEC. 2. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
The board does not consider this issue to be relevant to the present case, since from the minutes of the OPs of 25 February 2008 and the decision under appeal, it is apparent that the OD did not consider whether Mr J. was duly authorised under A 134(8). [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:17 pm
” General comment No. 25, paragraph 25, adopted by the Committee on 12 July 1996. [read post]
