Search for: "DONALD v. THE STATE" Results 2541 - 2560 of 4,998
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 5:48 am by Famighetti & Weinick
The peculiar addition in the case was that it also involved the President of the United States, Donald Trump. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In 1776 he served as a delegate to the state constitutional convention, where he made a mark as a thoughtful and devoted public servant. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:21 am by Sandy Levinson
 But to accept the limitations of the judiciary, whether one is a liberal or a conservative, requires accepting the possibility that the Constitution itself needs significant non-judicially-imposed amendment, which only promotes feelings of despair and hopelessness given the true awfulness of Article V. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
If a federal judge wants Donald Trump to stop blocking users on his Twitter account, does the President need to comply? [read post]
30 May 2018, 7:19 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter in a concurring opinion of United States v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:50 pm by John Floyd
  Border Searches of Electronic Devices   The law is clear: the Supreme Court in 1977 in United States v. [read post]
RBG
29 May 2018, 1:21 pm by Harold O'Grady
She did so in a couple of groundbreaking cases, like Frontiero v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Defendants argued that blocking is not state action because it simply utilizes functionality made available to every Twitter user. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
In an attempt to persuade Tory Rebels to vote against the Leveson 2 amendments, the government added an amendment 62BC which provides that the Secretary of State mandate a review of press regulators alternative dispute resolution procedures, Brian Cathcart considers this in an INFORRM post. [read post]
27 May 2018, 2:35 pm by Ilya Somin
The similarity between deportation for crimes and conventional criminal punishment has been recognized by no less an authority than the United States Supreme Court, in the recent case of Sessions v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy highlights Janus v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here, for instance, is the view of Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Van Orden v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 7:17 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Sarah Grant reported the latest from the military commission in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Evening Standard editor George Osborne has criticised the proposed Data Protection Bill stating that cost amendment provisions shifting Claimants’ legal costs to papers would be unduly onerous. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Sophia Brill returned to last Wednesday’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]