Search for: "David A. Price" Results 2541 - 2560 of 6,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 9:17 pm by Christine Hurt
  My former boss David Sterling of Baker Botts rephrases this as "price impact," but it's hard to prove a price impact but not loss causation or vice versa. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 11:22 pm by Bernie Burk
  If you’re curious, David McGowan and I have tried to catalogue the theories offered and how well they fit the facts here at pages 41-64.) [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:14 am by Jim Calloway
My friends and colleagues, Sharon Nelson, David Ries and John Simek are experts in this field. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:45 pm by Simon Lester
So will David Beckham, apparently: David Beckham arrived in Finland on Monday for surgery on his torn left Achilles' tendon, an injury that will keep him out of the World Cup. ... [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:30 pm by Steve Gottlieb
But I want to make a different point than the ones that Ely, Rosenberg, or David and I made, that it is important to understand the price we have paid for the freedom we believe in and what that means for the future. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:51 pm
CastenedaValue pricing: Sentencing judge rules that fakes aren't worth same price as originalsPrimary sources: Judge's findings, final sentencingSecond opinion: Eleventh Circuit affirms sentencing based on retail value of infringed goodsBackstory: Husain Abdul Alim pleads guilty in Alabama courtStreet fight: Nike vs. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 6:24 am by Jean O'Grady
Could Law Street undermine the subscription base of Law360 which charges “Tiffany-prices” for a morning scan of headlines. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:45 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In an August 27, 2015 post-trial opinion (discussed here), Delaware Vice-Chancellor Travis Laster found that Dole Foods CEO David Murdock, and its General Counsel and Chief Operating Officer, C. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
After all, if the problem is simply a lack of revenue (owing largely to reduced allocations from the legislature), why shouldn’t we give in-staters (whose parents and ancestors paid for the University) the first option to pay additional tuition, rather than offering those higher-priced slots to non-Californians? [read post]