Search for: "Day v. United Bank" Results 2541 - 2560 of 2,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
Grant may continue to litigate his wrongful-death lawsuitNURSING HOME MORTGAGOR CHEATED HUD ON LOANS; SUIT SEEKS $77 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
  So then after the FDIC denies your appeal, you can sue the them in United States District Court, either: (1) in the district where the failed bank had its principal place of business or (2) in Washington, DC.Small Claim Pay-OutsRemember at the beginning when I mentioned that your repudiation damages claim probably won't get you much from the FDIC. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:27 am
Payne SUFFOLK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant Law Ex-Girlfriend Not a Tenant at Will, But Licensee; 10 Day Notice to Quit Appropriate to Evict Drost v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(IP finance) International bank of IP: a proposal for knowledge liberalisation (IPKat) How to fight fakes in a down economy (Managing Intellectual Property) Global - Patents Nations work to make IP systems combat climate change (Intellectual Property Watch) When prioritising IP, look to green tech (Technology Transfer Tactics) Global - Copyright What is the (copy)right way to maximise IP rights upon insolvency? [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
Our proposal codifies the approach the Ninth Circuit took in CFTC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:41 am
Koeltl, United States District Judge, denied these motions in two separate opinions issued on the same day. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
: Federal Administrative Court rulings in CALVI and TRELLEBORG cases (International Law Office) Motion marks: Swiss IPO allows Swisscom to file MPG-file of motion mark in motion (Class 46)   United Kingdom Class dispute over similarity of goods too complex for summary judgment: Daimler AG v Sany Group Co Ltd (Class 46) The war on counterfeits: how much would you spend? [read post]