Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 2541 - 2560 of 40,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2008, 5:35 am
Child pornography search warrant for defendant's premises failed to show probable cause under Second Circuit precedent. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 10:47 am by Jon Sands
In addition, a defendant can be guilty of robbery so long as he has an weapon, whether there is a nexus or not.The decision is here:https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/04/12/14-30208.pdfCongrats to Robert Schwartz and Melissa Winberg of the Federal Defender Services of Idaho (Boise).2. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:08 am
Mine Hill Corp., 207 Conn. 204, 541 A.2d 472 (1988), the continuing course of conduct doctrine does not apply to toll the statute of limitations set forth in CUTPA. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
Dec. 6, 2011) (2–1 vote): On 27 November 1997, plaintiff and Nikki Palmer–Mussa (“defendant”) were married in Raleigh, North Carolina. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:01 am
Toucan Golf, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:57 am by Legal Talk Network
Wexler has extensive experience defending both single and multi-plaintiff discrimination/harassment cases, class and/or collective actions, as well as lawsuits initiated by the EEOC. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:31 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a 6 1/2-year sentence for a man convicted of one count of child pornography possession. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 2:35 pm by Brittany Williams
A defendant does not forfeit their Fifth Amendment right to silence if they give notice of intent to offer an affirmative defense. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This, however, does not establish that the reasonable consumer would expect honey to contain pollen. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:27 am by Eleonora Rosati
In the course of the re-examination, the defendants asked the Riga Regional Court to refer questions to the CJEU on the interpretation of Article 4(2), and Article 5(1) and (2) of the Software Directive in the context of the unlawful sale of objects protected by copyright.The Riga Regional Court asked whether under Articles 5(1) and 4(2) an individual can rely upon the exhaustion of the right to distribute a copy of the program where he has acquired that program… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:08 am by Anthony Zaller
  The only issue preventing employers from documenting issues is not stressing the need to do document these items with management. 2. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:16 am
Defendants rely on (1) the statutory language of CAFA, (2) Congressional intent, and (3) the Fifth Circuit's decision in Braud. . . . [read post]