Search for: "Doe Entities 1-25" Results 2541 - 2560 of 2,849
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 1:49 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
An entity whose only investors are financial institutions and institutional buyers as set forth in M.G.L. c. 110A, § 401(m) and 950 CMR 12.205(1)(a)6.a. and b. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 12:12 pm by Robert J. Fleming
A restrictive covenant in an employment contract, whether a non-solicitation covenant or a non-competition covenant, is considered to be in partial restraint of trade and will be enforced only if it (1) is reasonable, (2) is supported by consideration, (3) is reasonably necessary to protect the restraining party’s interest, and (4) does not unduly prejudice the interests of the public. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
We begin by reviewing the applicable authorities defining the collateral source rule. 1. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
  Although this case has a lengthy and tortuous history, the sum and substance of the importance of this decision can be briefly summarized as follows:   1) When other pending actions in other jurisdictions are involved, the test to apply to a motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds is the “overwhelming hardship” test. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
To the extent that the law allows powerful individuals or corporate entities to ‘chill’ important, warranted comment concerning themselves, their activities, their products or their ideas, it is socially dysfunctional and should be reformed. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:37 am by PJ Blount
A resolution: European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 June 2010 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Earth observation programme (GMES) and its initial operations (2011–2013) (COM(2009)0223 – C7-0037/2009 – 2009/0070(COD)) (Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2009)0223), – having regard… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:13 am by PJ Blount
setting up the European GNSS Agency, repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 on the establishment of structures for the management of the European satellite radio navigation programmes and amending Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 P7_TC1-COD(2009)0047 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 172 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, Having regard to… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
New cases need to be integrated: you can use a whole image/work under certain circumstances, despite what you might have learned (no 25% rules). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
  See Orr & Turner, Apr. 14, 2010, here, showing that the top 1% receive almost 60% of the capital income). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
Does the secret lie in the facts before the referring court?] [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm by Gene Quinn
It was known for decades that, cancer cells, escape in the blood at an early stage of the disease; unfortunately though, at that stage they can be as rare as 1 in 100 million or 1 in a billion of blood cells. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
The disaster in the Gulf of Mexico has already resulted in death, injury, environmental devastation, and economic loss to individuals, businesses, and governmental entities. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Click HereAlaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities to Pay Nearly $1 Million for Alleged Clean Water Act Violations. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Click Here Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities to Pay Nearly $1 Million for Alleged Clean Water Act Violations. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA's maximum obligation for all services provided under the contract was $ 32,098 for April 1 through June 30, 1999; $128,390 from July 1, 1999, through June 30, 2000; and $128,390 from July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2001. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm by Adam Thierer
Along these lines, reclassification efforts would likely end up with the imposition of common carrier status on other entities that are not operating as common carriers today.[12] Consequently, the question of “Who gets the regulatory tar and feathers? [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:21 pm by William Carleton
    On page 998, strike line 12 and all that follows through page 1001, line 25, and insert the following:    SEC. 926. [read post]