Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 9,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 12:35 pm
Bring an action for ejectment, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:39-1 Unlawful entry prohibited. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:19 pm
Code § 35-47-4-5. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:10 am
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:51 am
§ 290, does not constitute sufficient notice to the Executive Branch. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:49 am
In part, the Proposed Examination Guidelines say: The AIA in 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(B) provides additional exceptions to the prior art provisions of 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:02 am
This should immediately strike one as odd because one does not usually think of Kerala or Pondicherry as the most crime-ridden parts of India. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:02 am
Code § 35-50-1-2 to include attempted murder in the list of crimes of violence. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:14 am
For the reasons given, we determine that independent claims 1, 11, and 15 are not amenable to construction and, thus, we terminate this proceeding with respect to claims 1, 11, and 15 under 37 C.F.R. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 12:32 pm
How does this happen? [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 1:21 am
"The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) clarified in C-444/02, Fixtures Marketing Limited v Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou (OPAP) [2004] ECR I-10549 that this meant: "any collection of works, data or other materials, separable from one another without the value of their contents being affected, including a method or system of some sort for the retrieval of each of its constituent materials" [32].Even if a database is identified, it… [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Hence, one has a $1 million FTC carryforward even though this was low-taxed income by U.S. standards. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:41 pm
§ 271(e)(2)(A), I’m not bothered by the majority’s decision that it does not necessarily shield a generic company from liability for inducing actual infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 10:05 am
Like many states, Illinois does not have an independent estate tax. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:49 pm
LEXIS 51 at *1-2 (B.P.A.I. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:28 am
Finally, the categorical exclusion argument is further undermined by the fact that federal law – 35 USC §273(b)(1) – explicitly contemplates the existence of at least some business method patents: Under §273(b)(1), if a patent-holder claims infringement based on a method in a patent, the alleged infringer can assert a defense of prior use. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:17 pm
The appellant does not have a prima facie case in its favour in view of the above discussion. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
Id. at *10.EnablementLegal Standard"To be enabling under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:21 am
Slovenia 1, USA 0. [read post]
