Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2017, 5:49 am
" [see here for an English translation of a subsequent court of appeal case].Could or should the same reasoning apply to performers' moral rights, which also exist under the French Intellectual Property Code (IPC)? [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 7:36 am
Consider State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:34 pm
This aspect was dealt with again on appeal by the English and Wales Court of Appeal in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as The London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limitedand (2) Ecotive Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 1729). [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:48 pm
Lord Sumption stated that the English position is clear - the prosecution history is only referred to in exceptional circumstances [Merpel - are those exceptional circumstances clear?]. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
These approaches can vary from those that would posit state constitutional supremacy the governs all political organs, even if the political organs themselves are responsible for the state constitution’s provisions, to variations on notions of the autonomy of the state constitution to which all other institution creating governance systems are bound. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
The Supreme Court has taken the view in Actavis v Eli Lilly that there is a law of equivalents - that's what the EPC says, and that must be adopted in English law. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Section 9 provides that: The section applies to an action for defamation against a person who is not domiciled (a) in the United Kingdom; (b) in another Member State; or (c) in a state which is for the time being a contracting party to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:20 am
Akpan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
Much reliance was placed by Actavis' counsel on the Court of Appeal in Actavis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ 444 which stated that:“32. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
It hasnothing to do with the story.State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
It hasnothing to do with the story.State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 2:55 am
After the Elk v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
A criminal prosecution is usually brought by the state. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:00 am
Kwon v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
We also note the treatment by the Canadian Trademark Opposition Board, confirmed on Appeal (see, for example, Cheung's Bakery Products Ltd v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:05 am
The duplication was made manifest, rather than avoided, by the fact each expert repeatedly stated that he agreed with passages in the other expert's reports. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 11:15 am
People, organizations, governments at all levels —federal, state and municipal— go through a process that can be anticipated and in doing so, facilitates the recovery and rebuilding efforts. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
The correction on page 2 (which related to a front page article” said “An Oct 25 article incorrectly stated that under proposals by academic staff in response to an open letter from students on ‘decolonising’ its English Faculty, Cambridge University will be forced to replace white authors with black writers.The proposals were in fact recommendations. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm
Kwon v. [read post]
