Search for: "General Products Corp"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 6,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2019, 1:37 pm
The FAR generally favors the Government clients’ entitlement to data and software rights in federal procurements. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 12:21 am
The Marine Corps, Block added, disposed of solvents "in accordance with generally accepted industry practices at the time. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Federal-Mogul Corp (Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: Plaintiff’s choice of forum for false marking claims given little weight where Plaintiff was formed specifically to pursue litigation: Unique Product Solutions, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
ITEX Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:14 pm
Thus, “Defendant is correct that the general rule in New York is that, absent privity, a plaintiff cannot recover damages for economic loss based upon breach of implied warranty. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am
Atlantic Research Corp., the Circuit Courts have "frequently grappled" with the interplay between Sections 107(a) and 113 of CERCLA. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:34 pm
The way in which Twombly is interpreted generates imbalance in the justice system. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:56 am
Two relative newcomers, Daisy Ridley and John Boyegas, play the new generation of rebel heroes. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 8:06 am
Kimberly-Clark Corp., No. 2:21-cv-01519-DAD-KJN, 2022 WL 16804522 (E.D. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:44 am
Ava Ruha Corp., 113 USPQ2d at 1580.Although petitioner's delay was a bit less than three years, shorter and slightly longer periods of delay have sufficed to support a laches defense. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
Masonite Corp., 316 U.S. 265, 278 (1942). [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Corp. of Am. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
The coming of the digital age, however, marked Polaroid Corp.'s doom. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:27 am
Party City Corp. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:52 am
Von Drehle Corp., No. 09-1942 (4th Cir. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:32 am
Corp, v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:54 pm
In today’s case (First Majestic Silver Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:40 pm
Int’l Multifoods Corp., 668 F.ed 1234 (CCPA 1982). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:13 am
International Multifoods Corp., 212 USPQ 641, 642 (CCPA 1982), which states that "[t]o establish likelihood of confusion a party must show something more than that similar or even identical marks are used for food products and for restaurant services. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:19 pm
In the case of Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
