Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 14,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2008, 9:34 am
And it will be the decision of the Court of Appeals that will be informative and dispositive.Let's hope he is right about that. [read post]
11 May 2012, 1:32 pm
Advocates hope the nascent industry will continue to create jobs and bring much-needed revenue into the state [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 5:02 pm
I am hopeful that they will reverse some of the law set by Gore and State Farm. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
I hope I don't say too many controversial things such that it becomes my last! [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm
All of which I want to put aside for now.Rather, what struck me is how there probably isn't, in fact, as nearly an effective cultural constraint against state-sponsored Brady violations as we'd hope (or expect) there to be. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
The 5-3 opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm
Rev. 771 (1978), I argued that the prevailing approach of invariably affirming logically inconsistent convictions (see United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 9:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:58 am
Like many municipalities (and states, for that matter) Stockton owes its retired employees far more in pensions than it can hope to pay. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Such was the story in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:01 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:31 am
Some of the more cryptic opinions to come out of the South Carolina Supreme Court simply state “We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision in [case name]. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:15 pm
One would hope that Brian Marsh, who had completed his 63-month sentence for drug dealing and was on a four year term of supervised release, would have stayed out of trouble. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am
However, the judgment in Lukaszewski & Ors, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20, handed down by the Supreme Court last week, appears to offer a ray of hope to applicants facing short time limits. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:01 am
We hope the Supreme Court will see it the same way. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
In Haynes v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 1:25 am
[United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:29 am
Revolution Eyewear v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Michael Geist Doorey’s Workplace Law BlogHeller v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 5:58 am
In that case and in McDonald v City of Chicago, Justice Antonin Scalia struck local ordinances banning handguns.The cases, however, left open the question of what standard should be imposed in reviewing the constitutionality of state hand gun laws. [read post]
