Search for: "Hall v. Hall" Results 2541 - 2560 of 6,394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Monday 18 May the Privy Council will hand down judgment in Elizabeth Ram (Administrator of the Estate of Pearl Baboolal) v Motor and General Insurance Company Ltd (Trinidad and Tobago) and Hall v Maritek Bahamas Ltd (The Bahamas). [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:30 am by Reuel Schiller
He shows up in Forging Rivals as the lead attorney in James v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:39 am
 Recent PatLit pieces review Unwired Planet v Huawei (FRAND and competition law issues held unsuitable for summary judgment) and the award of this year's Prix de thèse Véron & Associés. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  For example, in Quinton v Peirce & Cooper ([2009] EWHC 912 (QB)), where a DPA claim was added to libel and malicious falsehood claims, Eady J said: “I must now turn to the Data Protection Act. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am by Kali Borkoski
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> El Comite el Bienestar de Earlimart v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am by INFORRM
The first point arises from the relationship between the new tort of misuse of private information (recently recognised in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311) and the HRA. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:11 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 A.C.18; [2011] H.L.R.23, it was held that the decision in Pinnock was of general application whenever a public authority sought possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
 Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More food for thought… [read post]