Search for: "His Law v. USA" Results 2541 - 2560 of 3,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
The Council for Public Interest Law set up by the Ford Foundation in USA defined "public interest litigation" in its report of Public Interest Law, USA, 1976 as follows: "Public Interest Law is the name that has recently been given to efforts provide legal representation to previously unrepresented groups and interests. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by David Smith
Sibthorpe & Morris v LB Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 25 Champerty and maintenance are two common law doctrines relating to the funding of civil claims. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by David Smith
Sibthorpe & Morris v LB Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 25 Champerty and maintenance are two common law doctrines relating to the funding of civil claims. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:59 am by Steve Hall
His cases have ranged from the intricacies of intellectual property, such as his defense of music industry copyrights in 2005, to the complexities of the death penalty, such as his pro bono work in Wiggins v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:18 am by Nabiha Syed
As the New York Times reports, Justice Thomas acknowledged that he erred in not disclosing his wife’s employment as required by federal law, citing  “a misunderstanding of filing instructions. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
 In the second, Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
 In the second, Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:03 am by Conor McEvily
” The Court is also scheduled to hear oral argument in Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:44 am
But an entail is usually created by will, not by law, and provides that the eldest son and his heirs inherit, binding the property (land and buildings are the main thing) for generations. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:18 am by Nabiha Syed
At his Jost on Justice blog, Ken Jost opines that although “three female justices represent an advance for women,” the conservative majority on the Court has “shown no special awareness of the history of discrimination against women in law and society. [read post]