Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 6,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
In Monypeny v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm
(See Fenster v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm
Andews v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
R 4.4 of the FPR 2010 did not allow summary assessment of Wife’s case. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
LINDA MARIE BROGA, Appellee. 1st District.Dissolution of marriage -- Income -- Attorney's fees -- Trial court abused discretion by imputing income equal to minimum wage for a forty-hour workweek to former wife, without considering her pay from Army Reserves, while including in husband's income his pension and disability benefits in addition to a full-time imputed minimum wage -- It was improper to consider former husband's… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:51 am
A reasonable woman who had an eighteen-month affair with another woman's husband might well expect to hear the scorn of an angry wife. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm
This language not only envisions, in the case of a successful wife, remaining separated, and in some cases complying with visitation privileges, but also an unsuccessful husband's concomitant obligations, including the payment of alimony. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Borne v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
Moreover, although the wife argued against the husband's motion to return to the house, apparently it was not of major concern to her since she failed to cross-move for exclusive occupancy. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 11:02 am
In this matrimonial action, the issue before the court, by way of plaintiff-wife's ex parte application, is whether she may serve defendant-husband with the divorce summons solely by sending it through Facebook by private message to his account.While there has been much buzz in the press about this New York ruling, from a Canadian perspective, service by Facebook is by no means a new development.In fact, such service has been ordered since at least 2009.As discussed… [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:47 am
Interestingly, the husband’s health – or lack thereof – did not impact whether the couple would divorce, though researchers were quick to point out that could be for a myriad of reasons. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:21 am
Mikel v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Facts: Husband and Wife divorced in 1998. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm
No such limitation is applicable here and we perceive no "dangerous precedent" ensuing from a denial after trial of the plaintiff's application for authorization to return to the premises he and the defendant once shared as husband and wife. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 10:10 am
She and her husband sued. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 pm
Andews v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 1:55 pm
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:38 pm
Plaintiff-husband is a neurologist, and counsel claimed that his client's ability to care for his patients is severely impaired by his wife's conduct. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
Faced with the Husband's arrears of child support of $67,588, the Husband's portion of the marital residence minus those arrears is hereby awarded to the Wife as an equitable distribution in kind award of $118,912. [read post]
