Search for: "JOHN DOE #1, an individual" Results 2541 - 2560 of 5,079
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2015, 6:16 am by Jim Sedor
The lawsuit alleges Ciber hired Capital Consultants and one of its principals, John Radcliffe, to lobby within Gov. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
This framing may not be enough to justify standing, but it does articulate a coherent theory of when judicial enforcement of legislative prerogative would be justified. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
After Vincent John Zahorik was convicted of “making a false report to a police officer or law enforcement agency,” he appealed. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The bill’s provisions became effective on August 1, 2015. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:28 am by MBettman
R.C. 4111.14(B)(1) (In its implementation of constitutional minimum wage authority, section 4111.14 defines employee as an individual “employed in Ohio, but does not mean individuals who are excluded from the definition of ‘employee’ under 29 U.S.C. 203(e) or individuals who are exempted from the minimum wage requirements in 29 U.S.C. 213 and from the definition of ‘employee’ in this chapter. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:10 pm
Smith and John Owens: [T]he government’s continued authorization of the [Big Mountain Jesus] statue on federal land does not violate the Establishment Clause. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 4:19 am by David DePaolo
As a matter of fact, Neuropsychology was the first specialty to be individually and formally recognized by the American Psychological Association. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 10:58 am by Drew Falkenstein
 [5, 25, 33] If a known norovirus outbreak is in progress, public health officials may obtain specimens from ill individuals for testing in a lab. [5, 9] These lab tests consist of identifying norovirus under an electron microscope. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:01 am by MBettman
R.C. 4111.14(B)(1) (In its implementation of constitutional minimum wage authority, section 4111.14 defines employee as an individual “employed in Ohio, but does not mean individuals who are excluded from the definition of ‘employee’ under 29 U.S.C. 203(e) or individuals who are exempted from the minimum wage requirements in 29 U.S.C. 213 and from the definition of ‘employee’ in this chapter. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
As courts usually do, the Court of Appeals begins its opinion by explaining how, and why, the prosecution arose:On the morning of October 25, 2012, computer technician John Edwards went to Coastline Podiatry in Santa Ana to install a scanner/copier at appellant's office. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 11:53 am
It is Satan speaking from the mouth of Freire, John Dewy, and any number of fashionably popular thinkers about education. [read post]