Search for: "Legal Recoveries, Inc." Results 2541 - 2560 of 3,194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Those inspections noted several violations of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:56 pm by Brian
Here is some of the original email chain (names of course have been changed to protect the innocent): The original contact email and ensuing emails:   Your Name: Andrew Scammer Your Email: andrewScammer4u@gscammerbla.com Subject: Collection Matter Message: Dear Counsel, On behalf of Scammer Machinery Inc., we request your legal services and possible representation on a Debt Recovery matter involving Scammer Machinery Inc and a client in your… [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:40 pm by WIMS
"       Access the complete opinion (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:39 am by Page Perry LLC
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., et al, FINRA Dispute Resolution Arbitration Number 09-02697. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 1:45 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Aug. 2, 2010) MC Asset Recovery, LLC (MCAR) sued Castex Energy, Inc. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
For example, Texas court cases have found that legal liability for third-party damages includes diminution of value. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:21 am by Mark Tabakman
 These settlements, under law, must be judicially approved and if they are not, both parties (especially the defendant)  run the risk  that the settlement may be invalid and the plaintiff(s) then legally able to continue the lawsuit. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  The last part asks the Court to assume that individual consumers and employees can vindicate their legal rights without a class action. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 1:21 pm by WIMS
Cardin (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:17 am by Stefanie Levine
Patentee’s recovery for infringement of an “improvement patent limited to the value of the patented improvement, unless the entire value of the larger product incorporating the improvement was “properly and legally attributable” to the patent feature. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm by David M. McLain
The article suggested that the parties did not bring pertinent legal arguments and Colorado precedent to the court of appeals’ attention, and that large parts of the opinion may constitute dicta.Three U.S. [read post]