Search for: "MATTER OF J M J"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 5,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 4:00 am
Fitzgerald, M. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:30 pm
Concurrence: I'm into banning some forms of "hate speech. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
” Meanwhile, the Washington Post writes that Kagan displayed her “grasp of a wide array of legal matters. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 11:14 am
AEI, I'm certain, is very happy that this has gone well, but it had reasons to be doubtful before the fact. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:30 am
Steven J. [read post]
16 May 2008, 3:29 pm
NMCCA 200602348, slip op. at 7 (N-M. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 3:21 am
Vincent, of Vincent & Vincent, Riverton, Wyoming; Paul J. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:46 am
I’m not so sure. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 8:58 am
M. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
" As to alimony, since such contributions are excluded from the child support equation and child support carries great weight as a matter of public policy - the New Jersey Child Support Guidelines posit that children should not be forced to live in poverty due to family disruption - it is only sensible and reasonable for such contributions to be similarly be excluded from the alimony calculation. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:18 am
“Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joel M. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 2:29 pm
” The whistleblower, J. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:59 am
Notwithstanding the above, the Honorable Judge Richard J. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:57 am
I’ve said this before my friends, and I’ll say it again: I have a thesaurus and I’m not afraid to use it. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:47 am
I've made the point before that making universal pronouncements (or rules for that matter) based on the pathologies of the worst examples of corporate leadership, even if there are 100 examples, is operating on the availability heuristic, given that there are 9,000 publicly-traded companies (I'm pretty sure that's about right) in the U.S. alone. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:12 pm
The holding period is key – and that’s where the ex-dividend matters. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
John J. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:43 pm
Subsections (h) (i) (j) and (l) contain stylistic changes. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:35 am
The Honorable John J. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
Subsection (i) Briefs in a Case Involving Multiple Appellants or Respondents The proposed changes are stylistic Subsection (j) Sanctions for inadequate briefs This would be a new rule: "All briefs under this rule must be concise, presented with accuracy, logically arranged with proper headings and free from burdensome, irrelevant, immaterial or scandalous matters. [read post]
