Search for: "Martin v. State"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 4,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
The court cited to the well-known New York case Citibank v Martin, 11 Misc3d 219 (Civ Court, New York County 2005) which sets forth the requirements of a prima facie case, and clearly states that an assignee's proof of standing is essential to its prima facie case. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Aromino v Van Tassel ; 2011 NY Slip Op 51058(U) ; Decided on June 6, 2011 ; Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Richmond County ; Straniere, J. points out a plethora. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 9:27 am
App. 1984); Martin v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:28 pm
Overview Today, landowners in the state have the right to drain their land with the natural flow of water and discharge excess water into natural watercourses. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
In another note of distinction, Secretary Cortés-Vázquez is proud to be the first Hispanic to hold the position of Secretary of State of New York. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Though the Court punted in Frank v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:21 am
While Lines v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:49 am
Mark Martins’ statements before a pre-trial motions hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
The mother stated that in the first incident, the father “became angry, called her demeaning names, threw objects at her, and headbutted her while the child was at her feet” (BCCA at para 10). [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:24 am
State, supra (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am
Broadcom (in support of neither party) and in Thryv v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
(United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 9:17 am
(The full text of the decision in Humig v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:47 pm
In Gilbert v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:41 am
People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
Illinois Supreme Court Holds That Contractor Had No Duty to Preserve Evidence of Damaged I-Beam; Martin v. [read post]
