Search for: "Matter of G. C. ,"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 4,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 4:08 pm
MDL Docket No. 2303, Case No. 11 C 9308. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:59 am
SUBCHAPTER G - STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
The Board notes further the undisputed fact that substantially all conceivable embodiments of the display pack defined in the granted claims 5 to 7 (which are formally not dependent from claim 1) appear also to be subject-matter of claim 1 as granted. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:48 pm
Hulu, LLC, the Court stated that “[t]his court has never set forth a bright line rule requiring district courts to construe claims before determining subject matter eligibility. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:11 pm
NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
Thus, the opposition ground according to A 100(c) would not hold against the subject-matter of claim 1 disclosing said amendment. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
But statistically, that doesn’t matter. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
C. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
C. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 12:11 am
If you write out the equations for the error between the SVD-like model and the original data--just the given values, not the empties--and then take the derivative with respect to the parameters we're trying to infer, you get a rather simple result which I'll give here in C code to save myself the trouble of formatting the math: userValue[user] += lrate * err * movieValue[movie]; movieValue[movie] += lrate * err * userValue[user]; This is kind of like the scene in the Wizard of… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:24 am
” We have schizophrenia on the matter, which is to be expected. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:56 am
Prior to the change above in 2010 the Rules were amended in March of 2009 - 202.12 C – 3) Where the court deems appropriate, establishment of the method and scope of any electronic discovery, including but not limited to (a) retention of electronic data and implementation of a data preservation plan, (b) scope of electronic data review, (c) identification of relevant data, (d) identification and redaction of privileged electronic data, (e) the scope, extent and form of… [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:30 pm
G. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:13 pm
Opinion in CBD v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:11 pm
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:10 pm
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
Walters, G. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:14 pm
The Charged Party also waives the following: (a) filing of answer; (b) hearing: (c) administrative law judge’s decisions; (d) filing of exceptions and briefs; (e) oral argument before the Board; (f) the making of findings of fact and conclusions of law by the Board; and (g) all other proceedings to which a party may be entitled under the Act or the Board’s Rules and Regulations. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 6:11 pm
Ebrahimi, An Overview of the Private International Law of Iran: Theory and Practice (Part Two) Nikolay Natov / Boriana Musseva / Teodora Tsenova / Dafina Sarbinova / Zahari Yanakiev / Vasil Pandov, Application of the EU Private International Law Instruments in Bulgaria William Easun / Géraldine Gazo, Trusts and the Principality of Monaco Court Decisions Michael Bogdan, Defamation on the Internet, forum delicti and the E-Commerce Directive: Some Comments on… [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
How did the Legal Board decide this matter? [read post]
