Search for: "Matter of Thomas J." Results 2541 - 2560 of 2,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
Ogden, a Washington lawyer in private practice, as deputy attorney general; Elena Kagan, dean of the Harvard Law School, as solicitor general; Thomas J. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring as to all but footnote 14, in which Thomas and Breyer, JJ., joined. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 5:52 pm
 (See Arbitration's E-Discovery Conundrum, by Thomas J. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 2:17 pm
Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; Robin Sessions Cooley, Deputy Attorney General; Douglas J. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
"Whether an injunction should be granted is a matter of the trial court's discretion in balancing the equities. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
Maintained by two editors – Wendy Johnson Lario and Kristine J. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 4:45 am
  Organizations such as the First Amendment Lawyers' Association, the American Civil Liberties Union, People for the American Way, National Coalition Against Censorship, Coalition for Free Expression, Free Speech Coalition, Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression and the Association of Performing Arts Presenters are all defenders of exotic dancing in the adult entertainment industry. [19] IV. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae State of Indiana: Thomas M. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:35 pm
Prior to entering the academy, he practiced law at Debevoise and Plimpton, and clerked for Judge Damon J. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:28 pm
Mr Thomas also said the sentencing judge had indicated she did not believe the man was suitable for an order but later changed her position. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:45 pm
See Transcript at 15 ("we are not arguing. . .that tort remedies. . .are pre-empted as a general matter"), 16 "if the State standard was the same as the Federal standard, there wouldn't be any conflict"), 16 ("if you failed to provide it [new information to the FDA] altogether, there would not be. . .a pre-emption defense"), 18 ("we are not arguing that there is preemption in a situation where there is new information that is not brought to FDA's… [read post]