Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 2541 - 2560 of 3,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2009, 5:08 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor has written her first opinion for the Supreme Court -- and she already has made a difference. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:39 am
 JUSTICE DEPARTMENTS (78%); FRAUD & FINANCIAL CRIME (78%); LAWYERS (75%); SUPREME COURTS (71%); LAW COURTS & TRIBUNALS (71%);  ... [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:00 pm
Under a Consent Judgment entered in Clinton County Supreme Court, Della North, Inc. will pay costs and penalties of $7,000 to the state and cease running deceptive advertisements for its Della Suzuki dealership, located on Route 3 in Plattsburgh. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:02 pm
People v Basbus, 1649, 2759/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 8964; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:20 pm
EPA (link to Supreme Court page containing the opinion) EPA website UNEP's Climate Change website U.N. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:10 am
 72%); CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES CRIME (72%); SUPREME COURTS (69%); LAW COURTS & TRIBUNALS (69%) NEW YORK, USA (92%)   12. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am by malik11397
SOUTHWEST HOMES OF ARKANSAS, APPELLEE No. 08-1299 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS 2009 Ark. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
Broidy pleaded guilty before Justice Bart Stone in the State Supreme Court, New York County, Part 31, and was released on his own recognizance with travel restrictions. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
" The 112 count indictment unsealed in Cayuga County Supreme Court today charges 21 people with crimes including various Criminal Sale and Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance (class A,B,C,D felonies) and Conspiracy in the second degree (class B felony). [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:43 am by Mike Aylward
A new opinion of the First Department of the New York Supreme Court in Natural Organics, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It is true that the Supreme Court has said that "due process bars courts from applying a novel construction of a criminal statute to conduct that neither the statute nor any prior judicial decision has fairly disclosed to be within its scope. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:06 am
”[7] Then, Courts analyzed whether the professionals enjoyed an exemption from antitrust law and the Supreme Court explicitly held that professionals are subject to antitrust law in Goldfarb v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 2:18 pm
People v Johnson, 1541, 1748/99, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 8682; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:49 am
Nov 23, 2009) (NO. 168)Background: Defendant was convicted in the Supreme Court, New York County, Micki A. [read post]