Search for: "North v. State"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 13,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2011, 5:07 pm
Under Omega v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 9:44 am
The case was State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:54 am
Maine Springs, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:27 am
Appellants later filed this putative class action in the District of North Dakota, claiming that the United States had breached its fiduciary duty by approving the leases for the oil and gas mining rights, and that the defendant bidders aided, abetted, and induced the United States to breach that duty. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:49 am
Hockin v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:29 am
More background: Christopher Lund (Wayne State), “In Defense of the Ministerial Exception”, North Carolina Law Review/SSRN. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:59 am
MR v North Tyneside Council and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Housing and council tax benefits : other) [2015] UKUT 34 (AAC) The FTT in this case had found that the tenant was entitled to an ‘extra’ bedroom, as under a shared residence order, her son spent alternate weeks with her. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:09 pm
Fairbanks North Star Borough v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 5:34 am
Lacewell v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
("Kassian") pleaded guilty to maintaining a false record pertaining to the illegal dumping of bilge and wastewater into the ocean from the M/V North Princess. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:55 am
The January 2011 North Carolina Court of Appeals case of White v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 4:26 am
In Oxendine v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 12:06 pm
V. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 11:57 am
In North Pacific Roadbuilders Ltd. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 1:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:59 am
District Court for the District of North DakotaGuttormson v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:57 am
Guarascio v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:00 pm
In Spring v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 7:56 pm
The complaint (full text) in Rosenbrahn v. [read post]
