Search for: "POST PROPERTIES, INC." Results 2541 - 2560 of 9,334
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2019, 6:42 am
"Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Well, would you have? [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
But it is still the Board’s own number, as calculated from the Board’s own posted information. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:10 am by Alan Rosca
The post Mediatrix Capital, Blue Isle Markets Inc., & Blue Isle Markets Ltd. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:46 pm by Juvan Bonni
Home Expressions Inc., No. 18-2214 (Fed. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 2:33 pm
Prior to these two decisions, costs incurred by a party’s use of European Patent Attorneys as expert advisers were considered recoverable only to the extent the costs had been“necessary for the adequate conduct of the case”.In the recent 2019 decision, the High Court considered article 14 of Directive 2004/48 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights in light of… [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
As property, the trademark has monetary value, see Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:41 am by Bruce Zagaris
The case is Barnet Recovable Trust, and Sotheby’s Inc., Plaintiff-Appellees v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:41 am by Bruce Zagaris
The case is Barnet Recovable Trust, and Sotheby’s Inc., Plaintiff-Appellees v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Background Following the seminal case of Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311, this is the second significant piece of litigation arising from Google’s use of the so-called “Safari Workaround” in 2011-2012. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Post By Oliver Couture This summer, the Australian Federal Court went the other way in Sequenom, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by DONALD SCARINCI
NantKwest Inc.: The intellectual property case will address fee awards in patent cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
It is a previously unreported part of a broader examination by the House Oversight Committee, included in the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, into whether Trump broke the law by accepting money from U.S. or foreign governments at his properties. [read post]