Search for: "People v. Eugene"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 3,307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2014, 7:06 am
From Judge Posner’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 3:06 pm
Aside from its inherent significance, Belgium’s move requires us to revisit Roper v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:36 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:13 am
Last year, the Supreme Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
[David Kopel] Ninth Circuit strikes California’s restrictive rule against licensed carry of handguns
13 Feb 2014, 10:17 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Peruta v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 2:33 pm
In any case, State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:49 pm
Ct. 2011); and People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:28 am
Consider Grove City College v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:31 pm
But there are limits, as Wednesday’s Florida Court of Appeal decision in Root v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Reno v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:56 pm
For an interesting discussion of the issue, which expresses some sympathy to those who warn their family members, see United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
There, United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:25 am
So held a federal trial judge in Monday’s Elli v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 1:25 pm
This principle most often arises in church property disputes, where the Supreme Court has held that courts may not decide which faction in a church is the more religiously orthodox, but it also applies more broadly to prohibit the government from adjudicating people’s rights based on theological judgments (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:38 am
One such for me is Sexual Minorities Uganda v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 4:04 pm
The Louisiana Supreme Court didn’t specifically define what these terms mean, but it did cite Grutter v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:34 pm
So holds today’s Maine Supreme Judicial Court decision in Doe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
Both history and common sense make amply clear that people can identify with a certain religion, notwithstanding their lack of detailed knowledge about that religion’s doctrinal tenets, and that those same people can be persecuted for their religious affiliation. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
And in Gillette v. [read post]
