Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
See People v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 1:25 pm
In Tatta v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 8:13 am
In SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
The rates of acute kidney injury (13.49 v. 5.46 per 1000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 2.52, 95% CI 2.27 to 2.79) and acute interstitial nephritis (0.32 vs. 0.11 per 1000 person-years; HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.47 to 6.14) were higher among patients given PPIs than among controls. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:17 pm
While thirteen people were arrested for a range of offences, the police believed that another 15 or 20 participated in the violence but had not been identified. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 4:33 pm
Unlike regular warrants, the individuals affected by the searches are never given notice, much less enabled to seek a remedy for misuse. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:07 am
Villalpando v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:32 am
Given the tragic outcomes of some distracted driving, most do not want to admit to it. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm
On 4 December 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) handed down judgment in the case of Roman Zakharov v Russia ([2015] ECHR 1065). [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:14 pm
The court’s decision in State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 11:09 am
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s another case showing how American law applies to people with different cultural assumptions from our own, State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 4:45 am
When the Sixth Circuit decided Doe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
Further, the Court overruled the decision in Company X v Company Y, by which the Commercial Court felt bound, noting that it doubted most people incorporating the clause were aware of that decision. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 3:46 pm
In Authors Guild v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
R(Husband) v Solihull; Dixon v Wandsworth. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
R(Husband) v Solihull; Dixon v Wandsworth. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am
It would be unreasonable to let people receive actual money when harm occurs only virtually, especially given society’s increasing dependence on electronics. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:21 pm
Related Cases: California v. [read post]
