Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 39,081
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
On 15 May 2023 in the case of Sanchez v France, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) confirmed its earlier Chamber judgment of 2 September 2021 (see Inforrm post here). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
Under certain circumstances, people who defame others anonymously on the Internet may lose their anonymity. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 1:28 pm
"What the future holds: The changing landscape of federal Indian policy.Roadway to reform: Assessing the 2015 guidelines and new federal rule to the Indian Child Welfare Act's applications in State courts.Capital, inequality, and self-determination: Creating a sovereign financial system for Native American nations.Why Indigenous Peoples' property rights matter: Why the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples may be used to condemn … [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:34 pm
Hopefully, the Fourth Department's recent decision in People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:41 am
No big surprise here, but the Federal Court decision of HomeAway.com, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
So I don’t often blog on opinions anymore, but I felt some people who do school law may be interested. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 9:09 pm
:We also find reversible error in the trial court's almost continuous interference, during cross examination of the People's witnesses, in defense counsel's exploration of issues relevant to defendant's intent to sell (see People v Canto, 31 AD3d 312 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 900 [2006]; People v Melendez, 31 AD3d 186 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 927 [2006]; People v Retamozzo, 25 AD3d 73 [2005]; People v… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 2:59 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:22 am
Protip: “jokes” about murdering people made in private online conversations never look as funny to unintended audiences, like law enforcement and judges, as they may have felt at the time. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:22 am
But it may nonetheless be a telling one. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:24 am
I agree that the evidence in the present case established that the defendant’s posts were not confined to a small pool of people, but had infiltrated, at the least, the wider community in the context of football. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
Nor does it give people carte blanche to threaten others online. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm
A traditional telephone company laid physical wires to create a network connecting people. [read post]
3 May 2015, 12:01 am
The case of Westin Operator, LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:12 pm
The defendant in People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
A provision added by Proposition 59 states: “The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business, and, therefore, . [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:23 pm
”Hence there was infringement of Section 34(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act 194/93.Turning to the claim of passing off, Southwood acknowledged previous decisions that, when comparing the overall get up of the products and considering whether confusion is likely, one must appreciate that the appearance of wording on the products may not avoid a likelihood of confusion because there people in RSA who are illiterate. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:37 pm
Both places allow people over 350 to eat free. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:20 pm
Dec. 251 (2001)), we may use such decisions as guidance (People v. [read post]
