Search for: "People v. Wear"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 2,640
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
Jones now surmises that Lackey had, by May, brought the FBI into the picture, and was now prepared to wear a wire and help it prove the crime. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:05 am
A decision in 1939, United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:13 am
Washington Supreme Court decides "drive time" case In Stevens v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:15 am
Some people think, in Utah at least, that the firing squad is the most humane because it's just one bullet to the head - it's quick. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
(People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
The citation for the Santorelli case you list is People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 3:26 pm
Radical animal rights activists have been known to go about and throw blood on people wearing fur. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
Over half an hour after the execution began, a doctor wearing a blue hood to cover his face entered the execution chamber to check Angel Diaz's vital signs. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 1:21 pm
Let me get on a soapbox for a second, and say that reading this case makes me understand why people in the "ghetto" wear shirts that say "stop snitching. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:54 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 10:32 pm
Steven Penrod, a respected psychology-law professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, was unnecessary and might confuse the jury.In its opinion in People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:57 am
(Well, actually, nine people know, but they wear robes, and they're not talking.)There are two possibilities.On the one hand, Kent created a circuit split. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:32 pm
It was great to see people around the law school wearing badges proclaiming their support of LGBT rights. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:23 am
Ayres's September 26 ruling in People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 3:38 pm
We just wanted to provide you with a brief update on the Whitaker v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:39 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
Ashcroft v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
There is no longer any defense available for these people. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:35 pm
"David Souter was shattered" (page 177), so Bush v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:49 am
Chief Justice Back in the 'Stoneridge' Case
Legal Times
The Supreme Court announced Thursday that Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has re-entered the closely watched case of Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
