Search for: "Rich v. Rich" Results 2541 - 2560 of 3,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
This blog also closely monitors the developing role of the Patents County Court (PCC) in England and Wales (http://patlit.blogspot.com/) and hosts, in its 'PCC Page' series, the continuing saga of Cautious v IPOff -- a fictional action brought in respect of the infringement of rights in a robotic octpous, which highlights practical and legal issues which a litigant might expect to face in the PCC. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm by Bexis
FCC, 512 U.S. 622, (1994); United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:46 am
In 2009 the Feds seized several guitars and pallets of wood from a Gibson factory, and both sides have been wrangling over the goods in a case with the delightful name "United States of America v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:49 am
For scholars in the field, as well as for lawyers seeking a rich vein of doctrine to buttress a case, this unusual book will be of incomparable value. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:17 am by Florida Law Review
Rev. 1139 (2011)| PDF Jonathan Witmer-Rich, Interrogation and the Roberts Court, 63 Fla. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:57 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Judge Giles Sutherland Rich famously said that, in patent law, "the name of the game is the claim. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
And this is true for more specific economic effects as well: If, for instance, imposing liability on cities for accidents in public swimming pools leads to closing such pools, then poor children will have less opportunity to enjoy the activities enjoyed by middle-class and rich children (who have access to private swimming pools). [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 8:39 am by Rick Hills
Therefore, if you want a detailed analysis of why the 11th Circuit's recent opinion in Florida v. [read post]