Search for: "S. Holmes" Results 2541 - 2560 of 5,231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2014, 10:10 am by Jonathan Bailey
Suggestions That’s it for the three count today. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:09 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
Watson’s second marriage and Holmes’ retirement from his practice as a consulting detective, are still subject to protection. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
By Peter Dang In May of last year, we covered a lawsuit between Sherlock Holmes scholar Leslie S. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:36 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Whether it’s a reimagining in modern dress (like the BBC’s Sherlock or CBS-TV’s Elementary), vigorous interpretations like the Warner Bros. fine Sherlock Holmes films, or new stories by countless authors inspired by the characters, people want to celebrate Holmes and Watson. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 2:26 pm by Jonathan Bailey
While a judge has already ruled Holmes is in the public domain, there’s no conclusion yet on the Happy Birthday lawsuit. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:07 pm by Steve Matthews
Okanagan firm, Pushor Mitchell, had partner Lisa Holmes Wyatt be appointed to the Provincial Court bench this month. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:02 am by Jonathan Bailey
Suggestions That’s it for the three count today. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:52 am by Steve Lash
– Sherlock Holmes enters the public domain. [read post]
Holm, the Utah Supreme Court, over a powerful dissent by Justice Christine Durham, ruled that the bigamy law applied to both state-sanctioned and non-state- sanctioned marriages. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:13 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Holmes esq. of San Diego was bought off @FairNewsSpears perhaps you can get a quote. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
Reviewer Sterling Evans writes"Hernández’s conclusion is excellent! [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm by John Gregory
The case, People v Holmes, involved a high-profile defendant in a criminal case (the person who shot up the Colorado movie theatre – allegedly), but these cases should not turn on whether the person claiming a privacy right is sympathetic. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Birmingham’s s.184 decision found Mr B intentionally homeless for these reasons, adding that there were £715.94 in rent arrears.Mr B sought a review. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Birmingham’s s.184 decision found Mr B intentionally homeless for these reasons, adding that there were £715.94 in rent arrears.Mr B sought a review. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm by Howard Friedman
 He finds that in the views of the dissent in the Holm case:the court agrees with Chief Justice Durham['s dissent] that the “purports to marry” prong should be interpreted “as referring to an individual’s claim of entry into a legal union recognized by the state as marriage. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm by Gordon Firemark
Found that the user’s ability to alter the video game character’s appearances is insufficient to constitute transformative fair use of Hart’s publicity rights. [read post]