Search for: "Stanford Law Review"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2011, 6:08 am
She is a graduate of Stanford Law School (where she was a law review editor) and MIT (where she graduated at the top of her class with an electrical engineering degree). [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:31 am
Lemley of Stanford Law School and Kimberly A. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:46 am
There are 13 cases where all reviews of the sentence have been completing and nothing remains but to execute, and CDCR has needlessly allowed itself to be enjoined from carrying out its duty. [read post]
18 May 2009, 12:30 pm
I've only heard his praises sung on the lawyering side, and you'll want to keep your eye out for his forthcoming Stanford Law Review article on the underlying issues. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:46 pm
Conveniently enough, the answer to ALL* of these fascinating questions can be found in my latest article, currently posted on SSRN and being processed at a law review office near you : Blakely and its recent progeny have focused attention on a broad swath of fact-finding in sentencing decisions. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm
Segall at ACS Law, Carrie Severino at National Review, Timothy G. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 11:52 am
(Nonprofit Law Blog); Text of Proposed Regs (IRS) Growth of Artificial Intelligence – AI And Nonprofits: Not If Or When, But How (Forbes); 8 Steps Nonprofits Can Take to Adopt AI Responsibly (Stanford Social Innovation Review) [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
In a forthcoming article for the Georgia State University Law Review, Sarah Duranske, a professor at Stanford Law School, evaluated recent proposals to reform the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Petersburg Times article on Kagan's law review articles. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:47 pm
"--Eamonn Callan, Stanford University "First-rate. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:00 am
The infatuation of law review editors with constitutional law is not quite a fad—it has been dominant for some time—but I have never seen a persuasive argument that constitutional law scholarship is the most important or influential legal field. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:58 am
On the same day, Justice Kagan appeared at Stanford Law School at an event co-sponsored by the American Constitution and Federalist Societies. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
This time it was asked by two of America’s most prominent scholars of the patent system, Professor Robin Feldman of the University of California Hastings College of Law and Professor Mark Lemley of Stanford University, in their article, “Do Patent Licensing Demands Mean Innovation”, Iowa Law Review, November 2015. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
An analysis of the kinds of cases found to be coming before these courts between 1870 and 1970 appeared in the January 1977 Stanford Law Review. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
Esteemed law journals such as the Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, and Michigan Law Review subscribe to the Open Access Law Program, which encourages them to archive their articles under open access principles. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 10:30 am
It has to amount to credible and timely contestability of decisions, which platforms cannot simply override without too much effort.Martin Husovec is Assistant Professor at Tilburg University (appointed jointly by Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology and Society & Tilburg Law and Economics Center) and Affiliate Scholar at Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet & Society (CIS). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 8:26 pm
And What of Privacy Law Reform? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:02 pm
The New York Times October 14 2009 New Insights into Psychopathy Stanford Center for Law & the Neurosciences Blog October 17 2009 Flies get fright from false memories Nature News October 15 2009 Total recall achieved: Activating a small fraction of neurons triggers complete memory Nature News October 20 2009 Brain transplant bird points to origin of communication New Scientist October 20 2009 Human Brain Can… [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 9:36 pm
And last year, we waited for Stanford Law Review for four, excruciating, months. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
Kulbicki, arguing that the decision below was “clearly wrong as a matter of Sixth Amendment jurisprudence,” while in the Stanford Lawyer Joseph Grundfest explains why the denial of review in a major insider-trading case is “entirely unsurprising. [read post]
