Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 2541 - 2560 of 3,526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2019, 7:22 pm by Sheldon Gilbert
Rock, of Boston, as a member of the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
The antivaccination movement has been gaining traction in the United States for several years, much to the chagrin of safety-minded employers. [read post]
The antivaccination movement has been gaining traction in the United States for several years, much to the chagrin of safety-minded employers. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
Republican Lawyer Nominated to Fill Alito Seat on 3rd Circuit New Jersey Law Journal Shalom Stone, a Republican lawyer from New Jersey, is the White House choice to fill U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:27 am by Ken Shigley
First, it has long been the law in most of the United States that baseball spectators assume the risk of being hit by stray balls. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:47 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Sunovion”) appealsfrom the decision of the United States District Court forthe District of New Jersey granting summary judgmentthat Dr. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Yücel is a citizen of Sweden . . ., and was extradited from the Republic of Moldova to the United States in May 2014.U.S. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:50 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
When the United States Supreme Court issued Brown v Board of Education, southern states engaged in Massive Resistance against it. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:07 am by NCC Staff
NCAA, the Justices were considering if the federal law that regulates sports betting in New Jersey violated the 10th Amendment’s anti-commandeering provisions. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  After respondent repeatedly failed to make payments required under the agreement, the federal court modified its order and imposed various restrictions on respondent, inter alia, limiting his business and personal expenditures and generally confining his personal travel to the City of New York and his business travel to New York State and New Jersey (Baker v Dorfman, 2006 WL 988756)[SD NY 2006]. [read post]