Search for: "State v. Branch"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 6,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2008, 3:17 pm
Berger v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
Apfelbaum, 445 US 115; People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:41 am
In striking down the so-called “Chevron deference” doctrine, the Court stated that it improperly prioritized the legal interpretations of the executive branch over those of the judicial branch. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:56 am
In Citizens for Strong Schools, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm
In Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 2:06 pm
The Supreme Court dismissed the role of states in a footnote in Gonzales v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 8:08 pm
As we previously reported, the fate of the DACA program now rests in Judge Hanen’s hands, who is currently presiding over a lawsuit filed by the State of Texas along with seven other states (State of Texas, et al., v. the United States of America, et al.). [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:59 am
See Brenner v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:34 am
Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
DonkeyHotey Bush v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:56 am
I was just rereading the briefs and arguments in the landmark Myers v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 7:01 am
In the recent landmark US Supreme Court case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 2:25 pm
United States (1926), which held that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, such as postmasters, without the need for Senate approval. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:57 am
Marbury v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
The laws of many states used to require corroboration of a woman’s testimony of sexual assault in criminal cases. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 8:14 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 3:08 am
Bus Co., 44 AD3d 628; Hoffman v Kessler, 28 AD3d 718). 3. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
"The text of the full decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us]* Section 17 of the Public Officers Law provides for the defense and indemnification of employees of the State as an employer being sued in federal or state courts. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:52 am
“This frivolous lawsuit caused unnecessary distraction of our executive branch leaders during a sensitive national security crisis. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:06 am
”* Section 17 of the Public Officers Law provides for the defense and indemnification of employees of the State as an employer being sued in federal or state courts. [read post]
