Search for: "State v. Davis"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 6,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:45 pm
Davis' Christian duty is to uphold her oath of office, in which she swore to support and defend both the United States and Kentucky Constitutions. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
This post is based on a Davis Polk client memorandum. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
Rose Villazor (Davis) has posted Chae Chan Ping v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 8:23 pm
One of the cases establishing this principle is Printz v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:06 am
” In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held oral argument yesterday in Jones v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
The Republican president of the state Senate spoke at a rally last week in support of Davis. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 5:29 pm
The Justices turned her down without even asking for a response from the same-sex couples who had sued her, or from state officials in Kentucky whom Davis has sued over the issue. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:20 pm
Weighing in on one of the most important digital privacy rights cases of the year, EFF is asking the court to hear arguments in Davis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:21 pm
District Judge Cormac Carney concluded in the case of Jones v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:14 am
Weighing in on one of the most important digital privacy rights cases of the year, EFF is asking the court to hear arguments in Davis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:41 am
") AC35815 - State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
Brown v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm
The application (Davis v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Under the TCPA, it is `unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States -- (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system . . . [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
One of the most intriguing cases on the Supreme Court’s docket this fall is Foster v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
In Miller v. [read post]
