Search for: "State v. English" Results 2541 - 2560 of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm by Masahiro Kurosaki
Armed Attack and Request for Assistance As a starting point, Japan has repeatedly supported the International Court of Justice’s decision in Nicaragua v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Herrera then spoke with defendant, who spoke English. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 12:13 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
Amy Jackson’s ‘A critical legal pluralist analysis of the Begum Case’, Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 46/2010, is available on SSRN here: This paper considers the advantages of a critical legal pluralist analysis of the English case R (on the application of Begum) v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 9:08 am by Thalia Kruger
Recalling the ruling given by the International Court of Justice itself in 2012, in the case of the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
In Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers yesterday’s order inviting the United States to weigh in on Ridley School District v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
However, today's decision in Case T-526/09 PAKI Logistics GmbH v OHIM; soutenu par Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord -- available only in French and German so far -- has drummed up a lot of activity in the general vicinity of the Kat's email in-box, spearheaded by the articulate and erudite Simon Malynicz (3 New Square) who appeared for the Royaume-Uni [Merpel explains: the United Kingdom has been rebranded 'Royaume-Uni' in a desperate… [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:59 am by Robin Shea
But this is a very hot issue right now – keep particular watch on the case of Coats v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am by Andrew Smith, Matrix Chambers.
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
The opposite is also true, if there is a decline in your income, you may be able to lower your chapter 13 plan payments also.The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm by Larry Munn
In a recent decision of Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal, Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]