Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 2541 - 2560 of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
The CJEU noted that, if found otherwise, this would lead to an "absurd result": the subsequent registration of a design, obtained despite the earlier disclosure of an identical design intended to be incorporated in or applied to a different product, would allow the holder of the subsequent registration to prohibit the use of the same design for the product, which was the subject of the earlier disclosure.Nintendo v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:24 am by Kali Borkoski
”Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorari Holder v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:26 am by Linda Friedman Ramirez
Previously Posted:  On October 27, 2010 the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Hurtado v Holder,  affirmed the trial court's denial of habeas relief. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
Trump issued on Jan. 29 in a challenge brought by the ACLU of Massachusetts and local attorneys, and Mohammad v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:43 am by IP Dragon
Thank you.Declaration of Copyright Self-Regulation of the Chinese Internet SectorIn order to safeguard copyright and related right holders' lawful rights and interest, stimulate the healthy development of the Internet industry, safeguard social and public interests, the representatives of the Internet sector make the following declaration of self-regulation to society:I, Internet enterprises shall undertake their obligations to society, earnestly respect and propagate State… [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:18 am by Florian Mueller
Germany is the world's most popular patent litigation venue, and last week's legislative decision does nothing to dissuade patent holders from enforcing their intellectual property rights in the largest EU member state. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:04 am
Put it otherwise: how does the landmark decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in L'Oréal v eBay [noted here, here, and here] apply in an offline context? [read post]