Search for: "State v. Light" Results 2541 - 2560 of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2009, 12:35 am
In the case of Research in Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation [2008] EWHC 3026 (Pat) he stated:"the traditional approach to costs control of litigation in this country, which is after the event by way of an assessment of costs which limits the amount that can be recovered by the receiving party from the paying party, is inadequate and unsatisfactory. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
But in immigration and asylum cases these qualitative comparisons are made all the time, otherwise there would have been no development of the line of case law under Article 3 that stretches from D v United Kingdom in 1995 to Limbuela v Home Secretary in 2005, all of which hinge on lack of adequate medical care abroad. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:01 pm by NARF
United States Bureau of Reclamation (Rule 19, Water Rights) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Eagle Bear, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm by Dwight Sullivan
 Bonner, No. 10-0567/AF, which presents this issue:  ”WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THIS COURT’S RECENT DECISION IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]