Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its long-awaited ruling in the case of Google v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
In a decision widely considered the high-water mark of state-action doctrine, Shelley v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:29 pm
See State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:22 am
United States and Overton v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:32 pm
Last Thursday Advocate General (AG) Kokott handed down her Opinion in case C-104/18 P Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v Euipo (C-104/18 P). [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 4:46 am
Section 1071(b) of the TTAB's October 30, 2009 ruling in Christopher Brooks v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
So, for example, in BMW of North America v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:21 am
" Earlier coverage of Miller v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 10:17 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 7:11 pm
Gallo Winery v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
DC Comics and Marvel Characters, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
I can only hope it provokes a review of the adequacy of the measures available to combat the international trade in fake goods by preventing their transhipment through Member States. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:12 am
Andrusiek v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm
On 4 December 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) handed down judgment in the case of Roman Zakharov v Russia ([2015] ECHR 1065). [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:54 am
See Steven Westlake v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
