Search for: "State v. Outing" Results 2541 - 2560 of 90,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2009, 5:13 am
Marketing for "Phased Out" Cell Phone Could Violate California Unfair Competition LawThis posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.Wireless telephone subscribers stated California Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) claims against AT&T, based on the company's marketing and sale of a premium cell phone that it was allegedly in the process of phasing out, according to a… [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the Hiestand case as well as in other cases. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 6:02 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
Portland dog bite lawyers want to point out that Maine is a strict liability state with regard to dog bites. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Unit member bound by the terms set out in the collective bargaining agreement negotiated by the unionMatter of Raymond v Walsh, 2009 NY Slip Op 04832, Decided on June 12, 2009, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentOnondaga County Deputy Sheriff Joseph D. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:21 pm
We can't figure out how to italicize the title of a post, so we'll repeat that title here, with our emphasis added:"The Case for Field Preemption of State Laws in Drug Cases. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:50 am by Douglas A. Plazak
Corporate employers with employees located outside California will have to decide whether to agree to send any out-of-state employees to California for future Person Most Qualified/Knowledgeable depositions.The post Toyota Motor Corporation v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 7:10 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  (This practice was criticized in Bowman v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm by Steve Hall
He said it was the obligation of the local attorney to ensure his out-of-state colleagues had all the paperwork. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:45 am
A curious decision out of Connecticut highlights the Hobson's choice that some employers in that state might face if they do not secure covenants not to compete from all of their employees. [read post]