Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 2541 - 2560 of 6,784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2020, 1:55 pm by Roelke Law, P.A.
”  The court then stated “[p]rior to admitting similar fact evidence under section 90.404(2)(b), the trial court must determine whether the State proved the prior act by clear and convincing evidence, whether the prior act is sufficiently similar to be relevant, and whether the probative value of the collateral crimes evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice under the balancing test of section 90.403, Florida… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:27 am by Meg Martin
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
(P & F) 567(see LexisOne, or e.g Supreme Court of the United States (.pdf))Scott Dodson at the Virginia Law Review writes in Pleading Standards After Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
Grant, 108 P.3d 768 (Washington Supreme Court 2005). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
P. 12(b)(1) finding that they lacked jurisdiction to review the discretionary decision of USCIS. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:14 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, CIVIL RIGHTS, EDUCATION LAW, GOVERNMENT LAW P., by His Parents v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
  Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that a defendant can assert any of several, listed defenses in a motion, instead of an answer. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm by Lauren Bridges
Co., No. 2016-C-1647, p. 31 (La. 10/18/17), ___ So. 3d ___. [5]              Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm by Lauren Bridges
Co., No. 2016-C-1647, p. 31 (La. 10/18/17), ___ So. 3d ___. [5]              Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm by Lauren Bridges
Co., No. 2016-C-1647, p. 31 (La. 10/18/17), ___ So. 3d ___. [5]              Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:20 pm
"There as some exceptions to this general rule, however.PERB, relying on the Court of Appeals ruling in Freudenthal v. [read post]