Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 29,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:17 am
In UNITED STATES v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 12:35 pm
Sonner v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:51 pm
In Leeds LP v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 6:18 am
” White v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 7:36 am
Padilla v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
Take HHS v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:39 am
Any future plans that the parents may have are irrelevant to its inquiry. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:18 am
Any future plans that the parents may have are irrelevant to its inquiry. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 1:13 pm
We disagree with Branches Neighborhood Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Plans & Trust Funds, 133 S.Ct. 1184, 1191, 1197 (2013)). [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am
ARCO petitioned for certiorari, contending that state law claims for further cleanup were preempted by CERCLA and that the cleanup proposed by the landowners could conflict with the remedial action plan selected by the EPA. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:56 am
I had originally planned on discussing all in one fell swoop, but as I started writing about the first of these decisions, Cariou v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:16 am
Under Chevron, the agency’s interpretation might be due some deference, but not under King v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:09 pm
The Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Even if you do not live in Massachusetts, if you are caring for an elderly loved one and may or may not be an heir apparent, there is something to be learned from a recent case in the Bay State, Cheney v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 5:37 am
In Avila v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 2:44 pm
The District denied the request, and Funderburke sued both the District and the New York State Department of Civil Service, whose rules govern the benefits plan, as well as various officials. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm
See, e.g., McReynolds v. [read post]
