Search for: "State v. R. M. C."
Results 2541 - 2560
of 2,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2016, 11:16 am
Or for stating that biological males who view themselves as female should be viewed as men, not as women. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
For the first time in a substantive Confrontation Clause opinion in the Crawford era (I’m not counting Whorton v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP) Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46) Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v… [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
I said their commercials usually misrepresent the present state of tax collection, with remarks like “The IRS is coming down harder than before. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Attorney General William Barr stated in the Wall Street Journal that the belief that ESG factors are material to profitability “appears to rest more on hope than fact. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:53 pm
C-324/09 ¶34 [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The Court also filled out its March 3 argument calendar by re-setting some previously granted cases: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
But by far the most interesting aspect of the letter from the M. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Accordingly, the proposals provide for an exclusive head of jurisdiction for court proceedings supporting arbitration in the civil courts of the Member States and the corresponding obligation of the courts in all other Member States to transfer parallel litigation to the courts of the Member State where the arbitration takes place. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
I’m gonna blow the place up. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and… [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:19 am
Contreras & M. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
C. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful – Suneet Sharma. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
Hope Avenue, Suite 320 Bangor, ME 04401 Phone: (207) 941-2952 Fax: (207) 941-2955 E-mail: bobbijo.yeager@ucpofmaine.org MAINE STATE RESOURCES AGING Eastern Agency on Aging 450 Essex Street Bangor, ME 04401 Phone: (207) 941-2865; (800) 432-7812 (Toll Free in-state only) Web: http://www.eaaa.org Bureau of Elder and Adult Services State House, Station 11 Augusta, ME 04333 Phone: (207) 624-5335; (800) 750-5353 (Toll Free) Fax: (207) 623-1797 Web:… [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:23 am
" It'll be a lot of fun when Scalia hears about this. 10:40: Tom Corbun (R-OK) had this strange question "You've said that Roe v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am
R. 3467 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reform the estate and gift tax. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:09 pm
A 2018 C-SPAN poll found that 52% cannot even name a single Supreme Court justice. [read post]
