Search for: "State v. Words" Results 2541 - 2560 of 36,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2013, 2:51 am by Jonathan Glasson QC, Matrix.
The post Case Comment:Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 59 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 10:14 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The court’s syllabus: Affirming the district court’s summary judgment, the panel held that the Yakama Treaty of 1855 did not preclude enforcement of the State of Washington’s escrow statute, which requires tobacco companies to place money from cigarette sales into escrow to reimburse the State for health care costs related to the use of tobacco products. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
It is also worth recalling the words of Lord Atkin in Ley v Hamilton (1935) 153 LT 384 at 386: It is precisely because the real damage cannot be ascertained and established that the damages are at large. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by Erin Miller
In some instances, like in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:32 pm by Larry Munn
  The Court then went on to state that the Member did not consider that in refusing to register the RED HORSE trademark, Molson was effectively being granted a trademark monopoly over the word HORSE of any colour in relation to beer. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 12:15 pm
But that doesn't mean that the state is barred from refiling those charges after the resulting dismissal. [read post]