Search for: "Thomas View" Results 2541 - 2560 of 12,083
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2020, 3:38 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Justices Alito and Thomas have long held the view that when a state seeks to invoke the Court's original and exclusive jurisdiction, the Court is obligated to hear the case. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:44 am by Brett Holubeck
You can view all of the bills that have been proposed so far here. [read post]
  This factor informed Marcus Smith J’s view as to whether they were reading the prior art documents and the patent through the right lens. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
Now, each institution must outline its view in a forthcoming joint political statement. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:13 pm by Ilya Somin
The Court was unanimous, and Thomas's opinion doesn't hedge or mince any words. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:24 am by Howard Friedman
In an 8-0 opinion (written by Justice Thomas), the court described the case as follows:Respondents Muhammad Tanvir, Jameel Algibhah, and Naveed Shinwari are practicing Muslims who claim that Federal Bureau of Investigation agents placed them on the No Fly List in retaliation for their refusal to act as informants against their religious communities. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:52 am by Richard Mair (CIPA President)
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Handbook of Blockchain Law: A Guide to Understanding and Resolving the Legal Challenges of Blockchain Technology by Matthias Artzt, Thomas Richter€ 181 Patent… [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:18 am by Matthias Weller
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 13/14 September 2021, planned to be taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. [read post]
Justice Thomas recently endorsed Harrison’s view, writing that “[r]emedies ‘operate with respect to specific parties,’ not ‘on legal rules in the abstract. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by Amy Howe
Both Alito and Kagan asked whether, on the shareholders’ view, everything that the head of the SSA had ever done would be invalid. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:41 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
As recently as this past February, two justices (Thomas and Alito) expressed the view that the Court is obligated to grant such motions and hear state claims. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although political accountability plays a vital role in democratic government in most circumstances, where the public hold misguided views, it can be problematic. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 8:44 am
Court of Appeals, with virtually all of his law clerks having gone on to clerk with conservative justices on the Supreme Court, a total of 40, 33 of whom clerked for either Justice Thomas or Justice Scalia. [read post]
This contractual view was also probably a victory for the French civil law doctrine [5] defending this view over the doctrine advocating a competitive approach [6]. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 12:34 pm by Ilya Somin
The clashes over the Garland and Barrett nominations were just part of a long series of other bitter conflicts over Supreme Court seats, including the bitterly contested nominations of Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, and others. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:41 am by Andrew Kent
Biden has not made an explicit statement on the matter, but he may have already publicly signaled his views on both of these issues. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Eugene Volokh
We conclude that anyone viewing Brinkman's comments would have viewed them as nothing more than expressions of Brinkman's opinions, rather than a declaration of facts. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:50 pm by Amy Howe
Both Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas seemed doubtful that the court even had the authority to apply rules retroactively. [read post]