Search for: "United States v. Stevens" Results 2541 - 2560 of 4,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
The First Amendment issues in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
Quest Recovery Services, Inc., 06-263 The Court GVR'd this ADA case to the 6th Circuit so that it could consider both the views of the United States as intervenor and the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, 477 n.9 (Cal. 1988); Stevens v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Steven Cohn Carle Place, N.Y. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Surreal State of Legal Salaries in New York August 14, 2007 To the Editor, Without getting into the question of whether we have all fallen down the rabbit hole with respect to summer associate salaries, there can be no question that we have with regard to judicial compensation. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
 Yesterday saw five of the most conservative of the Supreme Court justices refusing to require a state court system (in Texas) to let an International Court of Justice ruling cause Texas to deviate from its law that does not permit more than one state-level habeas corpus proceeding. blank">Medellin v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal made the government’s position clear:  the City violated Title VII each time it made a hiring decision based on an improper classification. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190 Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm by Guest Blogger
Announcing the Court’s judgment, Justice Stevens balanced the state’s interests against the limitations imposed by Indiana and found them constitutional. [read post]